Skip to content
Real Law SocietyRead Law. Not Lore.

Reading Room

Uniform Law

U.C.C. § 3-309 — Enforcement of Lost, Destroyed, or Stolen Instrument

Editorial summary. Section 3-309 permits a person who was formerly in possession of an instrument and entitled to enforce it, but who cannot reasonably obtain possession because the instrument has been lost, destroyed, or stolen, to enforce the instrument upon adequate proof and upon providing the obligor with reasonable protection against a subsequent claim of the instrument by another party.

Citation: U.C.C. § 3-309 (Am. L. Inst. & Unif. L. Comm'n 1990, amended 2002)Jurisdiction: United StatesEffective: 1990-08-01

Text

Governing Rule

Codified text.

Editorial note. Section 3-309(a) sets three conditions: (1) prior entitlement to enforce; (2) loss not resulting from voluntary transfer or lawful seizure; (3) inability to obtain possession by reasonable means. Section 3-309(b) requires proof of the terms of the instrument and adequate protection to the obligor against any future claim.

2002 Amendment

Codified text.

Editorial note. The 2002 Amendment eliminated the requirement that the plaintiff have been in possession at the time of loss, allowing enforcement by a transferee of a lost instrument to whom possession was never delivered.

Codified text.

Editorial note. Frequently invoked in mortgage-note foreclosure where the original note cannot be located. Courts require proof of the note's terms and adequate protection under § 3-309(b), commonly by indemnification bond.

Codified text.

Editorial note. See U.C.C. §§ 3-301; 3-418(d).

Revision history

  • 1990-08-01Promulgated with Revised Article 3.
  • 2002-07-31Amended to allow enforcement by transferees of lost instruments.

Related Publications

Editorial articles from Real Law Society Press that discuss this authority.

Canonical source: https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/3/3-309
Established · MMXXVRead Law. Not Lore.Vol. I — Folio I