Institutional Commitment
AI Transparency Policy
The Society's canonical institutional commitments concerning the responsible use of artificial intelligence in support of its scholarly work.
Effective 2026-06-27
Principles
Human Stewardship
Scholarly judgement remains with the Society's members, faculty, and editors. Machine assistance does not displace human stewardship of the Society's corpus.
Bounded Assistance
Machine assistance is bounded to clearly delineated roles — finding, assembling, relating, and assisting — without claim to scholarly authorship.
Disclosure
Where machine assistance materially shapes a member's experience, that fact is acknowledged.
Continuity
The Society's commitments here are continuous with its broader editorial and scholarly standards.
Institutional Posture
The Society makes considered use of artificial intelligence in support of its scholarly and member-facing work. Such use is institutional in character and is governed by the same standards that govern the rest of the Society's editorial and operational conduct.
Roles of Machine Assistance
Machine assistance within the Society's surfaces is bounded to four canonical roles, each with a distinct institutional character. These roles correspond to the Society's conceptual models for Search, Retrieval, Recommendation, and AI Assistance.
- Search finds: the location of material within the Society's corpus.
- Retrieval assembles: the gathering of relevant material into a form suitable for human consideration.
- Recommendation relates: the suggestion of connections among material that a reader may otherwise overlook.
- AI Assistance assists: the support of human inquiry without substitution for human judgement.
Scholarly Authorship
Authorship of the Society's editorial works rests with the human authors who compose them. Machine assistance does not constitute authorship and is not credited as such within the Society's publications.
Member Experience
Where machine assistance materially shapes the presentation of material to a member — for example, by ordering search results or by surfacing related works — the institutional character of that assistance is acknowledged through the Society's editorial practice and through this Policy.
Limits
The Society does not employ machine systems to make consequential decisions about members in the absence of human review. The Society does not employ machine systems to fabricate scholarship under the Society's name.
Continuity
This Policy is to be read together with the Editorial Standards, the Publication Ethics, and the Privacy Policy. It is continuous with — and does not redefine or supersede — the Society's conceptual Search, Retrieval, Recommendation, and AI Assistance Models.
Editorial Notes
- search
- Search Model — the canonical conceptual model for finding within the corpus.
- retrieval
- Retrieval Model — the canonical conceptual model for assembling material.
- recommendation
- Recommendation Model — the canonical conceptual model for relating material.
- aiAssistance
- AI Assistance Model — the canonical conceptual model for assisting human inquiry.
Revisions
- 2026-06-27Initial publication.
