Iqbal is read here against the rule it construes. The case note begins with Rule 8(a)(2) and the short and plain statement it requires, and reads the decision as a reading of that text.
The note treats the plausibility standard as a procedural threshold, not a substantive judgment, and surveys the lower-court applications that have followed.
A closing section addresses the practitioner's question: what does a complaint look like after Iqbal, when it must survive a Rule 12(b)(6) motion read against the standard the case articulates?
